30 Novembre 2010 
traduzione Io, ovviamente, mi sono perso il momento importante di quando i media mainstream si sono rivoltati contro la guerra. Ma chi può negare che sia avvenuto ciò quando vediamo Wikileaks e i media mainstream che uniscono le forze per esporre la brutta verità delle U.S. invasion of Iraq, Afghanistan and, more recently, what the U.S. State Department thinks of the world leaders? I mean, this is what is happening, right? 
Wrong.
What is happening is that Wikileaks has been promoted by the media in order to sell the lies of all time, only now the lies come sugar-coated, with an "informant" glazed to allow better digestion. The lies themselves do not disappoint me that much, and I can understand why the general public has been deceived, but I must admit to being disappointed at how the poison was swallowed without Wikileaks alcuna riflessione dai tanti siti di notizie apparentemente alternative. Siti come Counterpunch
, Global Research ,
Citizens for a Legitimate Government e
Information Clearing House
, per citarne solo alcuni, sembra stiano tutti diffondendo la storia di Wikileaks senza il minimo accenno di pensiero critico.
Dal primo giorno, i registri di Wikileaks della guerra afgana e irachena, hanno rivelato poco più di nulla che non fosse già a disposizione del pubblico: Che gli Stati Uniti hanno usato squadre di assassini in Iraq e Afghanistan? Vecchie news. Seven years ago, the Guardian informed us that the squads of executioners "operating in Iraq were not only Americans, but had been trained by the Israelis! And in any case, it is more terrifying, the idea that squads of executioners "are used to flush out the evil" Taliban "in Afghanistan or the fact, buffeted by high-circulation U.S. newspaper earlier this year, which Obama signed a law authorizing the killing of American citizens by the CIA? What the United States pay for the average Iraqis and Afghans for a positive coverage are not only old news but it is only half the story! We have already forgotten the Lincoln Group and the early Christian Bailey? In 2005, the Lincoln Group won (he was given) a contract worth 100 million dollars for control essentially all Iraqi media through its publications, "Iraq" and the monopolisation of the advertising industry of Iraq on an ongoing basis. All these details have been reported by the mainstream press, but has not done anything to stop the endless bogus "war on terrorism." Why then we have been encouraged to expect the documents to Wikileaks, which transmit the same information, they should do better? E ', because this information will soon be delivered to the black hole of history (again), while other details, more strategically important, will be repeated ad nauseum? What the U.S. has killed thousands of innocent civilians in Iraq and Afghanistan? Old news. In fact, on this, the Wikileaks documents support a much lower estimate of deaths in Iraq and Afghanistan, closer to the discredited "Iraq Body Count", rather than the much more realistic estimate of almost 1.5 million victims ( in Iraq) by Just Foreign Policy. But the quibbles about the number of Muslim deaths are not important, after all, only Muslims are not real people, and the over- esposizione su tutti i media mainstream dei misfatti degli Stati Uniti in Iraq e Afghanistan in se non è un male. Se Wikileaks si fermasse a questo, sarei più che felice di applaudire il misterioso signor Assage e l'altrettanto misteriosa provenienza dei suoi documenti. Ma i documenti Wikileaks dicono molto di più dell'uccisione arbitraria nelle guerre di conquista, essi forniscono anche il sostegno per il perseguimento e l'ampliamento di quelle guerre, in particolarmente verso l'Iran e il Pakistan. Ad esempio, i "registri di guerra" Afgani forniscono "la prova" che il Pakistan sta aiutando i Talebani - questo la fa il Pakistan, e non,
come riferito dalla CIA
: "Department of persistent Western forces in Afghanistan who use their helicopters to transport the Taliban fighters, strongly denied by the military, are fueling the distrust of the forces that are supposed to be bringing order to the country.
One such story came Shanin 209esimo by a soldier of Afghan National Army Corps, which fought against the growing insurgency in the province of Kunduz, northern Afghanistan. Within a few months, he had taken part in several intense battles against the armed opposition. " Just when the police and army were able to encircle the Taliban in a village in the district di Qala-e-Zaal, abbiamo visto gli elicotteri atterrare con squadre di sostegno" ha detto . "Sono riusciti a salvare i loro amici dal nostro accerchiamento, e hanno anche inflitto una sconfitta all'Esercito Nazionale Afgano.
" Il riassunto
del Britannico Guardian dei registri della guerra afgana è questo:
What is happening is that Wikileaks has been promoted by the media in order to sell the lies of all time, only now the lies come sugar-coated, with an "informant" glazed to allow better digestion. The lies themselves do not disappoint me that much, and I can understand why the general public has been deceived, but I must admit to being disappointed at how the poison was swallowed without Wikileaks alcuna riflessione dai tanti siti di notizie apparentemente alternative. Siti come Counterpunch
, Global Research ,
Citizens for a Legitimate Government e
Information Clearing House
, per citarne solo alcuni, sembra stiano tutti diffondendo la storia di Wikileaks senza il minimo accenno di pensiero critico.
Dal primo giorno, i registri di Wikileaks della guerra afgana e irachena, hanno rivelato poco più di nulla che non fosse già a disposizione del pubblico: Che gli Stati Uniti hanno usato squadre di assassini in Iraq e Afghanistan? Vecchie news. Seven years ago, the Guardian informed us that the squads of executioners "operating in Iraq were not only Americans, but had been trained by the Israelis! And in any case, it is more terrifying, the idea that squads of executioners "are used to flush out the evil" Taliban "in Afghanistan or the fact, buffeted by high-circulation U.S. newspaper earlier this year, which Obama signed a law authorizing the killing of American citizens by the CIA? What the United States pay for the average Iraqis and Afghans for a positive coverage are not only old news but it is only half the story! We have already forgotten the Lincoln Group and the early Christian Bailey? In 2005, the Lincoln Group won (he was given) a contract worth 100 million dollars for control essentially all Iraqi media through its publications, "Iraq" and the monopolisation of the advertising industry of Iraq on an ongoing basis. All these details have been reported by the mainstream press, but has not done anything to stop the endless bogus "war on terrorism." Why then we have been encouraged to expect the documents to Wikileaks, which transmit the same information, they should do better? E ', because this information will soon be delivered to the black hole of history (again), while other details, more strategically important, will be repeated ad nauseum? What the U.S. has killed thousands of innocent civilians in Iraq and Afghanistan? Old news. In fact, on this, the Wikileaks documents support a much lower estimate of deaths in Iraq and Afghanistan, closer to the discredited "Iraq Body Count", rather than the much more realistic estimate of almost 1.5 million victims ( in Iraq) by Just Foreign Policy. But the quibbles about the number of Muslim deaths are not important, after all, only Muslims are not real people, and the over- esposizione su tutti i media mainstream dei misfatti degli Stati Uniti in Iraq e Afghanistan in se non è un male. Se Wikileaks si fermasse a questo, sarei più che felice di applaudire il misterioso signor Assage e l'altrettanto misteriosa provenienza dei suoi documenti. Ma i documenti Wikileaks dicono molto di più dell'uccisione arbitraria nelle guerre di conquista, essi forniscono anche il sostegno per il perseguimento e l'ampliamento di quelle guerre, in particolarmente verso l'Iran e il Pakistan. Ad esempio, i "registri di guerra" Afgani forniscono "la prova" che il Pakistan sta aiutando i Talebani - questo la fa il Pakistan, e non,
come riferito dalla CIA
: "Department of persistent Western forces in Afghanistan who use their helicopters to transport the Taliban fighters, strongly denied by the military, are fueling the distrust of the forces that are supposed to be bringing order to the country.
One such story came Shanin 209esimo by a soldier of Afghan National Army Corps, which fought against the growing insurgency in the province of Kunduz, northern Afghanistan. Within a few months, he had taken part in several intense battles against the armed opposition. " Just when the police and army were able to encircle the Taliban in a village in the district di Qala-e-Zaal, abbiamo visto gli elicotteri atterrare con squadre di sostegno" ha detto . "Sono riusciti a salvare i loro amici dal nostro accerchiamento, e hanno anche inflitto una sconfitta all'Esercito Nazionale Afgano.
" Il riassunto
del Britannico Guardian dei registri della guerra afgana è questo:
Come un'unità "nera" segreta di forze speciali da la caccia ai leader Talebani per "ucciderli o catturarli" senza processo.As NATO commanders feared that neighboring Pakistan and Iran were fueling the insurgency.
Come gli Usa hanno nascosto la prova che i Talebani avevano acquisito mortali missili terra-aria.
As the Taliban have led to the increasing carnage with a massive escalation of their campaign of bombings on the streets, which killed more than 2,000 civilians so far.
- have this kind of revelations that are causing serious problems to the governments of the United States? Will lead to the indignation of the public? After having been conditioned for years to believe that the "Taliban" are evil monsters, people will get angry or be quietly proud of the fact that "secret unit special forces "are hunting the Taliban" without trial "? The" revelation "that the Taliban have gained ground to air missiles or damage claims will support the Government of the United States who claims to be fighting a war against a formidable enemy in Afghanistan? What does the fact that the coalition has hidden these alleged "facts"?
- And since the Taliban were "massively intensified their campaign of roadside bombings, killing more than 2000 civilians" is harmful to the government, or "proof" that the U.S. is fighting a good fight in Afghanistan? The other British newspaper reported that the "records of war "was the Afghans New York Times . The interim head said
- The Pakistani intelligence service Help insurgents, reports the claim. The fate of Combat Outpost Keatink illustrates many the frustrations of the efforts of allies: low levels of troops, Afghan unreliable partner and a growing insurgency
- . military and intelligence reports provide a real-time history of the war in Afghanistan from the perspective of American troops who are actually implementing the fighting and reconstruction
Così, grazie a Wikileaks, l'improbabile beniamino dei media mainstream, il mondo è informato del fatto che il "nemico" in Afghanistan è sempre più forte, il Pakistan e l'Iran sono da biasimare e i coraggiosi soldati americani sono impiegati nella "ricostruzione"! Ma il Pakistan e i Talebani non sono l'obiettivo principale della disinformazione di questi documenti. Mentre vengono rilasciati maggiori documenti, diventa chiaro che c'è l'Iran seduto nella piazza con gli occhi da toro. La prima serie di fughe di notizie fornivano questa "rivelazione" sensazionale, qui riportata dal Telegraph Britannico:
Wikileaks: come Iran has developed a new suicide vest for al-Qaeda in Iraq for its use. According to the findings released by Wikileaks support Iranian forces have fueled the insurgents who are attacking coalition troops and have designed new forms of suicide vests to al-Qaeda.ognuno sa che Saddam aveva la stessa capacità diversi anni fa, ricordate ? In realtà, questa "rivelazione" circa la capacità dell'Iran di minacciare l'Europa è ancora più credibile rispetto alle affermazioni "eccitate" del dossier Iraq, perché questa rivelazione viene da Wikileaks, un'organizzazione di informazioni onesta verso dio, giusto? Voglio dire, non c'è proprio nessun modo in cui gli agenti che lavorano per conto del governo americano e israeliano potrebbero utilizzare such an organization to spread propaganda, right? There is nobody in the community of alternative information that I can see this for what it is? North Korea provides missile to Iran to attack Europe?! Just when the United States and Israel are involved in a prolonged effort to demonize Iran in the world and the U.S. has placed an aircraft carrier off the Korean coast? All this is meant to be so obvious, or my reading of "psychological operations for dummies" he gave me the startling insight of how the propaganda really works?
Only in their wildest dreams the warmongers in Washington and Tel Aviv could wish for a similar release of "secret information". And here the last set of papers, published in part a few days ago. When I read their contents, say I was shocked would be grossly exaggerating my reaction. I could have written them myself:
Wikileaks: l'Iran 'ottiene missili Nord Coreani che possono colpire l'Europa' Questo, devo ammetterlo, è del tutto credibile, perché, dopo tutto,
anyone really believe that creates a real loss because it is known that some individuals in the U.S. State Department believes that Sarkozy is an "emperor with no clothes"? And this must be a secret? It is certainly not a secret for more than 60% of the French public that, years ago, openly stated the same. Similarly, the "revelation" about Berlusconi: "inept, vain, ineffective as a leader in modern Europe? About the "senile, megalomaniac, psychopathic, pedophile," this is what the Italians and the majority of Europeans say, the U.S. State Department does not read the papers before completing the "secret files" on foreign leaders? And what about the North Korean dictator Kim Jong-li? Based on these "harmful revelations" he un "tizio vecchio e flaccido". Questa rivelazione è intesa a creare una sorta di frattura diplomatica tra Washington e la Corea del Nord prima o
dopo
che gli Stati Uniti e il suo stato cliente della Corea del Sud bombardino Kim per riportare qualche milione di nord-coreani all'età della pietra? E il presidente iraniano Ahmadinejad - 'Hitler'?? Qualcuno si aspetta forse che il governo di Obama voglia ritrattare ciò oppure nasconderlo agli occhi del pubblico? Più precisamente, siamo tutti affetti da amnesia collettiva? Chi si era riferito ripetutamente all'Iran e al suo leader democraticamente eletto come una Germania Nazista e un nuovo Hitler? Nessuno? Ok, ecco un suggerimento. Ok, quindi io Israel I mentioned a few times. Why? this is the reason, the Horse's Mouth:Israel was not damaged in any way from the publications Wikileaks
In Israel, Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, said that he felt to claim the revelations of [Wikileaks] about the extent of Arab and international concerns about Iran and its nuclear program. "
" said Netanyahu. "The documents show many sources to support evaluations of Israel, particularly Iran. Our region has been hostage to a narrative that is the result of 60 years of propaganda that paints Israel as the greatest threat. In fact, the leaders understand that this vision has failed. For the first time in history there is a consensus that Iran is a threat.
"he said.
There's also the fact that it is public knowledge that Israel runs an extensive and very well established network of spies
in the United States, including the infamous Israeli art students i. In 2005, the FBI had noticed, for example, that Israel maintains "an active program of information gathering within the United States." One method fundamental to Israel, told the FBI report, is computer intrusion. And what should we do about the strange where coincidence, the day it releases Wikileaks documents that contain key information about Iran's nuclear program, the Israeli Mossad kills
an Iranian nuclear scientist and wounded another in Tehran?
In determining the source of the Wikileaks documents, we must ask ourselves a question: who has the interest to pressure the U.S. government through the issuance of documents to the press (via Wikileaks) to force the U.S. to make some effort to limit damage, while simultaneously portraying Iran as the greatest threat to world peace? Because ultimately, this is the overall effect of the Wikileaks documents. Wikileaks working so bad in the "sniffing le prove" che mi sento fiducioso nel suggerire che i documenti possono non essere nemmeno originali; e se lo sono, sono molto probabilmente stati modificati in modo tale che servono all'agenda Israelena-Sionista. link articolo originale
: http://www.wariscrime.com/2010/12/01/news/wikileaks-serves-israeli-agenda-of-demonizing-iran/
0 comments:
Post a Comment