Le temperature mondiali, andava avanti, si sono bloccate inesorabilmente in un trend sempre in salita:"Le nostre previsioni sperimentali per decade confermano le precedenti indicazioni che circa metà degli anni 2010-2019 saranno più caldi dell'anno più caldo osservato finora, il 1998." I funzionari del Met Office si vantavano apertamente di sperare, attraverso le loro dichiarazioni, di convincere l'assemblea di Copenaghen a imporre nuovi e stringenti limiti alle emissioni di carbonio, un obiettivo che non era stato rispettato. La scorsa settimana, nel mezzo di un altro gigantesco festino climatico delle Nazioni Together with 15,000 delegates, held this time in the tropical splendor of Cancun in Mexico, the Met Office said it again. Never mind that Britain, as happened last winter and the first, was immersed in the grip of a cold wave that saw temperatures plunge to minus 20 different ° C, and that 2010 was the coldest since 1996 . Globally, it insisted, in 2010 was still in the running to be the first or second warmest year since records current.
The icy grip of winter, drivers and pedestrians struggling in the storm of Kent la scorsa settimana
Ma, sepolta in mezzo ai dettagli di quelle due affermazioni del Met Office nei passati 12 mesi, giace una notevole marcia indietro con enormi implicazioni, non solo per il Met Office, ma per il dibattito sul cambiamento climatico nel suo complesso.
Una donna e una ragazza seduti sotto un albero su una panchina in Sud Weald Park, Brentwood, nell'Essex, questa settimana
In realtà, con l'eccezione del 1998 - un anno di "punta" dove le temperature si innalzarono a causa dell'energico effetto 'El Nino' (il ciclico riscaldamento del Pacifico meridionale che influisce sul clima di tutto il mondo) - i dati del Met Office e del CRU sui loro siti web mostravano che le temperature globali erano state costanti non per dieci anni, ma per gli ultimi 15 anni.
Esse salgono un po, poi scendono un po, ma quelle piccole climbs and descents are at a lower level of the known margin of error of their measurement systems. They have no statistical significance and do not reveal any evidence of any trend. When the Met Office published this prediction in December 2009, we expect a peak El Nino still clearly larger than that of happened in 1998 - so big that it would drag up the average of the decade. But, though he still successfully tried to influence the media headlines during the conference in Cancun last week, saying that 2010 could end up as the warmest year, the lowest print reveals the reverse of the Met Office. Last year he predicted that the average in 2010 was 14.58 ° C. Last week this was reduced to 14.52 ° C. This may not sound like much. But if we consider that from the minutes of the Met Office, the overall increase in global temperatures since 1850 has been less than 0.8 degrees, this is a great thing. Above all, it means that the trend remains flat. Meanwhile, according to an analysis yesterday by David Whitehouse of Global Warming Policy Foundation, 2010 had only two months an unusually warm March and April, when El Nino was at its peak. The October data suggest that late last year, when the final figure will be calculated, the year 2010 will not be more caldo di tutti, ma al massimo il terzo più caldo, dietro al 1998 e al 2005. Non si contesta che il mondo sia diventato un po più caldo per un periodo nel corso del XX secolo (tra il 1940 e i primi anni settanta le temperature effettivamente calarono). Ma a poco a poco, il presunto costante "consenso" scientifico riguardo al senza precedenti innalzamento di temperatura, che è destinato a continuare verso livelli disastrosi, e che è tutta colpa degli esseri umani, comincia a sfilacciarsi.
All'inizio di quest'anno, un articolo di Michael Mann - per anni un protagonista dell'IPCC, e l'autore del famoso 'grafico hockey stick' che mostrava le temperature piatte per 2000 anni fino al recente aumento dizzy - did an extraordinary admission: that, as his critics have always said, there was instead was a 'Medieval Warm Period' in the year 1000 AD, when the order was to be warmer than it is now. Other studies are beginning to show that the cyclical changes in water vapor - a greenhouse gas far more potent than carbon dioxide - may explain most of the warming of the twentieth century. Even Phil Jones, director of the CRU at the center of the scandal 'Climategate' release of the emails last year, was forced to admit in an interview to the BBC online just noticed that, since 1995, had been an 'Heating not statistically significant '.
One of those e-mails leaked, dated October 2009, it was Kevin Trenberth, climate analysis chief at the National Center for Atmospheric Research of the U.S. government and lead author of the IPCC on the science of climate change within the His monumental report in 2002 and 2007. He wrote: "The fact is that, at the moment, we can not explain the lack of heating, and this is a travesty that we can not admit." After release, Trenberth said the world is still warming themselves because of CO2, and that 'parody' was not the 'pause' but the failure of science to give a explanations. The question now emerging, both for climate scientists to politicians is simple. How to be a long pause before the thesis that the world is warming because of human activity begins to collapse?
In an article in the Telegraph of 29 November last year the global warming alarmists scientists asked for us the rationing of food, travel and energy consumption ... meantime and if they are spassata a Cancun
Io, ovviamente, mi sono perso il momento importante di quando i media mainstream si sono rivoltati contro la guerra. Ma chi può negare che sia avvenuto ciò quando vediamo Wikileaks e i media mainstream che uniscono le forze per esporre la brutta verità delle U.S. invasion of Iraq, Afghanistan and, more recently, what the U.S. State Department thinks of the world leaders? I mean, this is what is happening, right?
Wrong. What is happening is that Wikileaks has been promoted by the media in order to sell the lies of all time, only now the lies come sugar-coated, with an "informant" glazed to allow better digestion. The lies themselves do not disappoint me that much, and I can understand why the general public has been deceived, but I must admit to being disappointed at how the poison was swallowed without Wikileaks alcuna riflessione dai tanti siti di notizie apparentemente alternative. Siti come Counterpunch
Come un'unità "nera" segreta di forze speciali da la caccia ai leader Talebani per "ucciderli o catturarli" senza processo.
Come gli Usa hanno nascosto la prova che i Talebani avevano acquisito mortali missili terra-aria.
As NATO commanders feared that neighboring Pakistan and Iran were fueling the insurgency. As the Taliban have led to the increasing carnage with a massive escalation of their campaign of bombings on the streets, which killed more than 2,000 civilians so far.
have this kind of revelations that are causing serious problems to the governments of the United States? Will lead to the indignation of the public? After having been conditioned for years to believe that the "Taliban" are evil monsters, people will get angry or be quietly proud of the fact that "secret unit special forces "are hunting the Taliban" without trial "?
The" revelation "that the Taliban have gained ground to air missiles or damage claims will support the Government of the United States who claims to be fighting a war against a formidable enemy in Afghanistan? What does the fact that the coalition has hidden these alleged "facts"?
And since the Taliban were "massively intensified their campaign of roadside bombings, killing more than 2000 civilians" is harmful to the government, or "proof" that the U.S. is fighting a good fight in Afghanistan? The other British newspaper reported that the "records of war "was the Afghans New York Times . The interim head said
The Pakistani intelligence service Help insurgents, reports the claim.
The fate of Combat Outpost Keatink illustrates many the frustrations of the efforts of allies: low levels of troops, Afghan unreliable partner and a growing insurgency
. military and intelligence reports provide a real-time history of the war in Afghanistan from the perspective of American troops who are actually implementing the fighting and reconstruction
.
Così, grazie a Wikileaks, l'improbabile beniamino dei media mainstream, il mondo è informato del fatto che il "nemico" in Afghanistan è sempre più forte, il Pakistan e l'Iran sono da biasimare e i coraggiosi soldati americani sono impiegati nella "ricostruzione"! Ma il Pakistan e i Talebani non sono l'obiettivo principale della disinformazione di questi documenti. Mentre vengono rilasciati maggiori documenti, diventa chiaro che c'è l'Iran seduto nella piazza con gli occhi da toro. La prima serie di fughe di notizie fornivano questa "rivelazione" sensazionale, qui riportata dal Telegraph Britannico:
Wikileaks: come Iran has developed a new suicide vest for al-Qaeda in Iraq for its use. According to the findings released by Wikileaks support Iranian forces have fueled the insurgents who are attacking coalition troops and have designed new forms of suicide vests to al-Qaeda. Only in their wildest dreams the warmongers in Washington and Tel Aviv could wish for a similar release of "secret information". And here the last set of papers, published in part a few days ago. When I read their contents, say I was shocked would be grossly exaggerating my reaction. I could have written them myself: Wikileaks: l'Iran 'ottiene missili Nord Coreani che possono colpire l'Europa' Questo, devo ammetterlo, è del tutto credibile, perché, dopo tutto,
ognuno sa che Saddam aveva la stessa capacità diversi anni fa, ricordate ? In realtà, questa "rivelazione" circa la capacità dell'Iran di minacciare l'Europa è ancora più credibile rispetto alle affermazioni "eccitate" del dossier Iraq, perché questa rivelazione viene da Wikileaks, un'organizzazione di informazioni onesta verso dio, giusto? Voglio dire, non c'è proprio nessun modo in cui gli agenti che lavorano per conto del governo americano e israeliano potrebbero utilizzare such an organization to spread propaganda, right? There is nobody in the community of alternative information that I can see this for what it is? North Korea provides missile to Iran to attack Europe?! Just when the United States and Israel are involved in a prolonged effort to demonize Iran in the world and the U.S. has placed an aircraft carrier off the Korean coast? All this is meant to be so obvious, or my reading of "psychological operations for dummies" he gave me the startling insight of how the propaganda really works? anyone really believe that creates a real loss because it is known that some individuals in the U.S. State Department believes that Sarkozy is an "emperor with no clothes"? And this must be a secret? It is certainly not a secret for more than 60% of the French public that, years ago, openly stated the same. Similarly, the "revelation" about Berlusconi: "inept, vain, ineffective as a leader in modern Europe? About the "senile, megalomaniac, psychopathic, pedophile," this is what the Italians and the majority of Europeans say, the U.S. State Department does not read the papers before completing the "secret files" on foreign leaders? And what about the North Korean dictator Kim Jong-li? Based on these "harmful revelations" he un "tizio vecchio e flaccido". Questa rivelazione è intesa a creare una sorta di frattura diplomatica tra Washington e la Corea del Nord prima o dopo
che gli Stati Uniti e il suo stato cliente della Corea del Sud bombardino Kim per riportare qualche milione di nord-coreani all'età della pietra? E il presidente iraniano Ahmadinejad - 'Hitler'?? Qualcuno si aspetta forse che il governo di Obama voglia ritrattare ciò oppure nasconderlo agli occhi del pubblico? Più precisamente, siamo tutti affetti da amnesia collettiva? Chi si era riferito ripetutamente all'Iran e al suo leader democraticamente eletto come una Germania Nazista e un nuovo Hitler? Nessuno? Ok, ecco un suggerimento. Ok, quindi io Israel I mentioned a few times. Why? this is the reason, the Horse's Mouth: In Israel, Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, said that he felt to claim the revelations of [Wikileaks] about the extent of Arab and international concerns about Iran and its nuclear program. "
In determining the source of the Wikileaks documents, we must ask ourselves a question: who has the interest to pressure the U.S. government through the issuance of documents to the press (via Wikileaks) to force the U.S. to make some effort to limit damage, while simultaneously portraying Iran as the greatest threat to world peace? Because ultimately, this is the overall effect of the Wikileaks documents. Wikileaks working so bad in the "sniffing le prove" che mi sento fiducioso nel suggerire che i documenti possono non essere nemmeno originali; e se lo sono, sono molto probabilmente stati modificati in modo tale che servono all'agenda Israelena-Sionista. link articolo originale : http://www.wariscrime.com/2010/12/01/news/wikileaks-serves-israeli-agenda-of-demonizing-iran/
"The difference is that in Iceland we have allowed banks to fail," he said in an interview Grímsson Today's Mark Barton from Bloomberg Television. "These were private banks and we have pumped money into them to keep them alive, the State should assume responsibility for the failure of private banks." The British Libertarian political Nigel Farage, once considered as a fringe player, is now gaining international recognition for his warning to his fellow Europeans about the troubles of the system. He is rapidly becoming a hero of the resistance to the bankers, and his credibility to new heights of consent - just like his American colleague in Congress Ron Paul. His rant in Parliament Europeo si stanno trasmettendo in modo virale su YouTube , mentre la gente si sta svegliando alla propria servitù verso le banche e alla mancanza di vera democrazia e sovranità.
nota: se non si vedono i sottotitoli, apri il video sul canale YouTube e attivali con il pulsante cc in basso a destra Nigel Farage parla con molta fiducia contro l'UE, come dovrebbe, dato che i recenti sondaggi dei media mainstream mostrano che il 99% dei cittadini Britannici vogliono stare fuori dall'Euro . La battaglia contro il cartello bancario sta chiaramente avendo luogo con l'Europa come avanguardia. Mentre gli europei continuano a combattere contro i corrotti bankster internazionali, i pigri americani perdurano a vivere con un livello di vita molto più basso Good fellow, you support the fight! original article link : http://www.activistpost.com/2010/11/citizens-of-europe-rage-against-machine.html # more also read :
the crisis is a 'Opportunities: Making a global depression to create a World Government towards a single world currency The IMF managing director Dominique Strauss-Kahn urges the leaders to surrender more sovereignty to the EU nation states are Dead : The EU says the Chief
The Collapse of Social Security: French workers facing the neoliberal policy program From Depressione Globale alla Governance Globale "Esplosione sociale" derivante dalla crisi economica NWO: Elite globale e stati nazionali I Banchieri distruggono l'economia globale per pianificare il consolidamento del loro potere
La persona media può a mala pena immaginare il perché una Terza Guerra Mondiale dovrebbe essere anything but an event at the end of civilization. But we have heard once again the spread of Neocon rhetoric that insinuates that a new world war would be a viable option
to correct a dollar and a dying economy. Or, maybe, if you're a globalist, is only a good investment. Documents of the RAND Corporation indicated a willingness to
translation: 
translation: 
The icy grip of winter, drivers and pedestrians struggling in the storm of Kent la scorsa settimana 
Secondo l'IPCC e i suoi modelli al computer, senza un taglio enorme delle emissioni il mondo è destinato a diventare tra i due e i sei gradi più caldo nel corso del XXI secolo, con conseguenze catastrofiche. La scorsa settimana a Cancun, nel tentativo di influenzare i paesi più ricchi ad accettare di elargire immediatamente 20 billion pounds to the poor to compensate for the effects of global warming, the American International Food Policy Research Institute warned that the global temperature was 6.5 degrees higher by 2100, resulting in a surge in food prices and a decline in production. The math is not complicated. If the planet becomes six degrees warmer by the end of the century, should be getting warmer by 0.6 degrees every decade, if it becomes warmer than 2 degrees, then rise 0.2 degrees per decade. Fortunately it is not. 
Clinton's mentor was a professor at George Washington University, and his "formula" for the achievement of total control is the deception of the people through democracy, control of both political parties by the conspirators, so that they are different only at the surface to give the impression of free elections and alternation, ndt) 
Investments in the military-industrial complex: 
